Dynamics of humoral and cellular immune responses after homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.23.22272771: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Ethics approval was granted by the local ethics committees in Erlangen (Az. 340_21B) and Munich (Az. 26/21 and Az.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Study design and participants: The study is a follow-up analysis of 473 homologously or heterologously vaccinated participants that were previously only assessed for the production of antibodies using sVNT5.
    sVNT5
    suggested: None
    Antibody avidity: Binding strength of the SARS-Cov-2 IgG antibodies was determined by adaptation of the commercial IgG agile SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (Virion/Serion, Germany) using ammonium thiocyanate (NH4SCN) (Roth, Germany) as previously described16,54,55.
    SARS-Cov-2 IgG
    suggested: None
    Serum samples were measured using the IgG agile SARS-CoV-2 ELISA and diluted to 100 U/mL according to the standard curve provided by the manufacturer to exclude an influence of variable antibody concentrations.
    SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    ELISA
    suggested: None
    As a primary antibody, the SinoBiological anti-SARS-CoV-2-N T62 antibody (40143-T62) was used.
    anti-SARS-CoV-2-N T62
    suggested: None
    Goat anti-rabbit IgG2a-HRP antibody (EMD Millipore / order number 12-348) with 1% FCS-PBS was diluted to 1:4000 ratio.
    Goat anti-rabbit IgG2a-HRP antibody
    suggested: None
    anti-rabbit IgG2a-HRP
    suggested: None
    FACS-based analysis of anti-S binding antibodies: A modified version of our previously published serological assay was used, in which HEK 293T cells either stably expressing the spike protein from the original Wuhan strain or transiently expressing the spike protein of B.1.167.2 or B1.1.529, respectively, were used as target cells56.
    anti-S
    suggested: None
    To quantify antigen-specific antibodies, 5×105 HEK 293T cells were incubated with serum samples diluted in 100 µl FACS-PBS (PBS with 0.5% BSA and 1 mM sodium azide) for 20 minutes at 4°C to bind to spike protein on the surface.
    antigen-specific
    suggested: (Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-092-105, RRID:AB_615062)
    After washing with 200 µl buffer, bound S-specific antibodies were detected with anti-human IgG-AF647 (4°C, 30 min incubation; clone HP6017, Biolegend, Cat #409320).
    anti-human IgG-AF647
    suggested: (SouthernBiotech Cat# 2040-31, RRID:AB_2795651)
    The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) correlates with the level of bound antibodies56.
    antibodies56
    suggested: None
    ELISPOT plates (Millipore) were coated with anti-human IFN-γ monoclonal antibody (clone 1-DIK, Mabtech) at 0.5 µg/well overnight at 4°C.
    anti-human IFN-γ
    suggested: None
    After the stimulation period, the plates were washed and 80 µL of anti-human IFN-γ (FITC)/anti-human IL-2 (Hapten2) detection antibody solution was added for 2h at room temperature.
    Hapten2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    After one hour of preincubation, the inoculum was transferred to the pre-seeded VeroE6 cells for another one-hour incubation at 37°C before the inoculum was replaced by supplemented DMEM.
    VeroE6
    suggested: None
    FACS-based analysis of anti-S binding antibodies: A modified version of our previously published serological assay was used, in which HEK 293T cells either stably expressing the spike protein from the original Wuhan strain or transiently expressing the spike protein of B.1.167.2 or B1.1.529, respectively, were used as target cells56.
    HEK 293T
    suggested: None
    For the assessment of pseudotype neutralization, HEK293T-ACE2 cells were seeded at 2×104 cells/well in a 96well flat bottom plate.
    HEK293T-ACE2
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    To produce pseudotyped reporter particles, HEK293T cells were transfected with the SIV-based self-inactivating vector encoding luciferase (pGAE-LucW), the SIV-based packaging plasmid (pAdSIV3), and the respective spike variant-encoding plasmid as described previously58.
    pGAE-LucW
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The inhibition curve of each sample was analyzed by statistical analysis software Graph Pad Prism (GraphPad Software, USA), and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined using non-linear regression.
    Graph Pad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    After further washing, samples were measured on an AttuneNxt (ThermoFisher) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.)
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    The reciprocal serum ID50 was determined with Prism GraphPad 9 (San Diego, California, USA) by application of the Sigmoidal 4PL function.
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Isolation and cultivation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC): PBMCs were isolated from citrate peripheral blood of vaccinated individuals by density gradient centrifugation using Biocoll® separating solution, density 1.077 g/ml (Bio&Sell) and frozen in heat-inactivated FCS + 10% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) for liquid nitrogen storage.
    Biocoll®
    suggested: None
    Statistical analysis and graphical presentation: Statistics as well as figures were created with PRISM GraphPad 9.3.1.
    PRISM GraphPad
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.