Fusogenicity and neutralization sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta sublineage AY.4.2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.07.475248: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: This study was approved by the ILE DE FRANCE IV ethical committee.
    Consent: At enrolment, written informed consent was collected and participants completed a questionnaire which covered sociodemographic characteristics, virological findings (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results, including date of testing), clinical data (date of symptom onset, type of symptoms, hospitalization), and data related to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination if ever (brand product, date of first and second vaccination).
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationThe experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
    BlindingThe experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
    Power AnalysisNo statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size.
    Cell Line AuthenticationContamination: Cells were tested negative for mycoplasma.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell-cell fusion assay: For cell–cell fusion assays, 3.5*105 293T cell lines stably expressing GFP1-10 were transfected in suspension with 50 ng of phCMV-SARS-CoV2-spike and 450 ng of pQCXIP-Empty for 30 min at 37°C.
    293T
    suggested: None
    Vero GFP-11 cells were added at a confluency of 1.5.104 cells per well.
    Vero GFP-11
    suggested: None
    Titration of viral stocks was performed on Vero E6, with a limiting dilution technique allowing a calculation of TCID50, or on S-Fuse cells.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Viruses were sequenced directly on nasal swabs, and after one or two passages on Vero cells.
    Vero
    suggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)
    For studies on transfected cells, HEK293T cells were transfected in suspension using lipofectamine 2000 as per manufacturer’s instruction (ThermoFischer), using 25% of phCMV-SARS-CoV2-spike and 75% of pQCXIP-Empty.
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Plasmids: A codon-optimized version of the reference Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 Spike (GenBank: QHD43416.1) was ordered as a synthetic gene (GeneArt, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and was cloned into a phCMV backbone (GeneBank: AJ318514), by replacing the VSV-G gene.
    phCMV
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_15802)
    Cell-cell fusion assay: For cell–cell fusion assays, 3.5*105 293T cell lines stably expressing GFP1-10 were transfected in suspension with 50 ng of phCMV-SARS-CoV2-spike and 450 ng of pQCXIP-Empty for 30 min at 37°C.
    pQCXIP-Empty
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical analysis: Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo v10 software (Becton Dickinson).
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    Figures were drawn on Prism 9 (GraphPad Software).
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 9.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04750720RecruitingStudy of the Kinetics of COVID-19 Antibodies for 24 Months i…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.