A comprehensive antigen production and characterisation study for easy-to-implement, specific and quantitative SARS-CoV-2 serotests

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.19.21249921: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: For ELISA validations, left-over sera from SARS-CoV-2 patients and sera from convalescent donors, as well as historical sera (<2020) were taken from the MedUni Wien Biobank, as approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK 1424/2020).
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableThe virus was originally isolated from a clinical specimen, a nasopharyngeal swab taken in mid-March 2020 from a 25-year old male patient in Lower Austria, and was further passaged twice on Vero E6 TMPRSS-2 cells in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% (V/V)
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    5.1 Production of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 antigens for serodiagnosis: 5.2 Commercial antigen and antibody reagents: Recombinant spike proteins of the four common cold hCoV strains, HKU-1, OC43, NL63 and 229E were purchased from Sino Biological Inc, Beijing, CN (#40606-V08B, #40607-V08B, #40604-V08B and #40605-V08B, respectively).
    HKU-1,
    suggested: None
    HKU-1, OC43
    suggested: None
    NL63
    suggested: None
    #40606-V08B
    suggested: None
    #40607-V08B
    suggested: None
    #40604-V08B
    suggested: None
    #40605-V08B
    suggested: None
    A recombinant chimeric human/mouse anti-SARS-CoV-2 NP antibody consisting of a mouse scFv fused to the Fc region of human IgG1 (clone 1A6) was purchased from Abcam, Cambridge, UK (#ab272852).
    A recombinant chimeric human/mouse anti-SARS-CoV-2 NP antibody consisting
    suggested: None
    anti-SARS-CoV-2 NP
    suggested: None
    human IgG1
    suggested: None
    Left-over samples were assessed for SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and neutralizing titers in the early phase of infection and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Upper Austria (EK1083/2020), in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
    SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    The calibrator set covered the concentration range 0 – 100 U/mL and concentrations of anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies recognizing either tRBD or NP in patient sera could be read directly from the calibration curve.
    anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Vero E6 TMPRSS-2 cells, initially described in Hoffmann et al.(70) were kindly provided by Stefan Pöhlmann; Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany.
    Vero E6
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)
    TMPRSS-2
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    ROC-analysis data from automated tests (including Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG, DiaSorin LIAISON®
    Abbott
    suggested: (Abbott, RRID:SCR_010477)
    Data on the diagnostic performances of antigens and cross-reactivity were analyzed using Graphpad Prism Version 8.1.0
    Graphpad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) Validation data were analyzed using MedCalc v19 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) and Analyse-it 5.66 (Analyse-it Software, Leeds, UK) and SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc.).
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)
    Data from SARS-CoV-2 acute sera from hospitalized individuals or outpatients obtained by the B&S Central Laboratory Linz were statistically analyzed with the MedCalc 13.1.2.0.
    MedCalc
    suggested: (MedCalc, RRID:SCR_015044)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    A caveat of many assay validation studies is that performance characteristics are skewed by the exclusive inclusion of samples from hospitalized individuals, where robust antibody levels are to be expected (21). Likewise, the sole consideration of healthy donors in control groups may lead to overestimated assay specificity, as the impact of potential cross-reactive factors present in the general population is largely ignored. In this respect, auto-antibodies commonly found in individuals with inflammatory diseases (22) were already described to cross-react with SARS-CoV-1 antigens (23). To challenge our tests systems, we biased our large specificity cohort (n=1,126) by including samples with an increased propensity for cross-reactivity, including sera from individuals with inflammatory illnesses (n=359), sera from PCR-confirmed hCoV infections (n=8) and sera drawn during winter months to increase the likelihood of respiratory infections (n=494). Similarly, our sensitivity cohort (n=244) included convalescent sera from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals covering the full spectrum of clinical manifestations (from asymptomatic to ICU patients). Among them 21% of the sera were collected from asymptomatic individuals or from individuals with mild to moderate illness, who may mount less robust and durable antibody responses after an infection (24). Based on these cohorts, we defined adequate test parameters to enable highly specific detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. A cutof...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04416100RecruitingDevelopment of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) in Patients W…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.