SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro whole human proteome cleavage prediction and enrichment/depletion analysis

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.24.265645: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    70] Searching for “orf1ab,” “pp1ab,” and “1ab” within the family Coronaviridae returned 388 different, complete polyproteins with 762 different cleavages manually discovered using the Clustal Omega multiple sequence alignment server.[71–73] All 4,268 balanced positive cleavages were used for subsequent classifier training in addition to all other uncleaved coronavirus sequence windows centered at glutamines (17,493) and histidines (11,421), totaling 33,182 samples.
    Clustal Omega
    suggested: (Clustal Omega, RRID:SCR_001591)
    Enrichment Analysis: Protein annotation, classification, and enrichment analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) 6.8.[75, 76] My training data, prediction methods, and results can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/Luke8472NN/NetProtease).
    DAVID
    suggested: (DAVID, RRID:SCR_001881)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.