Altered pre-existing SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses in elderly individuals
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.26.21261082: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: Subjects: The study design was approved by the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate University (OIST) human subjects ethics committee (applications HSR-2020-024, HSR-2020-028).
Consent: All donors provided informed written consent.Sex as a biological variable Based on antibody test results, donors were grouped into seronegative young (n=45, 40 % male, 60% female; mean age 38 years, age rage 23-49 years), seronegative elderly (n=41, 17 % male, 83% female; mean age 81 years, age rage 70-93 years), seropositive young (n=19, 63 % male, 37% female; mean age 41 years, age rage 20-50 years), and seropositive elderly (n=11, 45 % male, 55% female; mean age 78 years, age rage … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.26.21261082: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: Subjects: The study design was approved by the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate University (OIST) human subjects ethics committee (applications HSR-2020-024, HSR-2020-028).
Consent: All donors provided informed written consent.Sex as a biological variable Based on antibody test results, donors were grouped into seronegative young (n=45, 40 % male, 60% female; mean age 38 years, age rage 23-49 years), seronegative elderly (n=41, 17 % male, 83% female; mean age 81 years, age rage 70-93 years), seropositive young (n=19, 63 % male, 37% female; mean age 41 years, age rage 20-50 years), and seropositive elderly (n=11, 45 % male, 55% female; mean age 78 years, age rage 70-91 years). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Then, cells were resuspended in RPMI1640 (Gibco) medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) human AB-serum (PAN-Biotech; P30-2901), seeded into 96-well, U-bottom culture plates (106 cells per well), and either left unstimulated (cells treated with equimolar amounts of DMSO) or stimulated with 1μg/mL SARS-CoV-2 M peptide pool for 7 h in the presence of 1μg/mL anti-CD40 (5C3; Biolegend; 334302) and 1 μg/mL anti-CD28 antibodies (CD28.2; Biolegend; 302934). anti-CD40suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 334302, RRID:AB_1236384)anti-CD28suggested: NoneAfter stimulation, cells were incubated with anti-Fc receptor-blocking antibody (Biolegend; 422301) and NIR-Zomibie (Biolegend; 423106) and stained with anti-CD3 (OKT3; Biolegend; 1:200), anti-CD4 (clone PPA-T4; Biolegend; 1:200), anti-CD8 (SK1; Biolegend; 1:200), anti-CD45RA (HI100; Biolegend; 1:100), and anti-CCR7 (G043H7; Biolegend; 1:100) antibodies. anti-Fc receptor-blockingsuggested: Noneanti-CD3suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 317318, RRID:AB_1937212)anti-CD4suggested: Noneanti-CD8suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 980902, RRID:AB_2616623)anti-CD45RAsuggested: (BioLegend Cat# 304106, RRID:AB_314410)anti-CCR7suggested: (Fluidigm Cat# 3159003, RRID:AB_2714155)For intracellular cytokine analysis, cells were subsequently fixed and permeabilized using Foxp3 Staining Buffer Sets (eBioscience; 00-5253-00) and stained with anti-IFN-γ (B27; BD; 1:100), anti-TNF-α (MAb11; Biolegend; 1:20) and anti-IL-2 (MQ1-17H12; Biolegend; 1:20) antibodies. Foxp3suggested: Noneanti-IFN-γsuggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 564039, RRID:AB_2738557)anti-TNF-αsuggested: (BioLegend Cat# 502913, RRID:AB_315265)anti-IL-2suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 500305, RRID:AB_315092)Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Samples were analyzed on a Fortessa X-20 (BD), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software version 10.7.1 (FlowJo LLC). FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)Statistical analysis: Unpaired t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.1.0 software. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-