Prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 boosts and broadens Ad26.COV2.S immunogenicity in a variant-dependent manner

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.24.21261037: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: The study was approved by the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 190/2020 and 209/2020) and the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) (no M210429).
    Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
    Field Sample Permit: Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC): Blood was collected in heparin tubes and processed within 3 hours of collection.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike and the Elecys anti-SARS-CoV-2 electrochemiluminescent immunoassays were performed (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH), which enable detection of total antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins, respectively.
    anti-SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay: The ability of plasma antibodies to cross-link FcγRIIIa (CD16) and spike expressing cells was measured as a proxy for ADCC.
    CD16
    suggested: None
    All stimulations were performed in the presence of Brefeldin A (10 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and co-stimulatory antibodies against CD28 (clone 28.2) and CD49d (clone L25) (1 µg/mL each; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
    CD28
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 347690, RRID:AB_647457)
    CD49d
    suggested: None
    After 16 hours of stimulation, cells were washed, stained with LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable VIVID Stain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and subsequently surface stained with the following antibodies: CD14 Pac Blue (TuK4, Invitrogen Thermofisher Scientific), CD19 Pac Blue (SJ25-C1, Invitrogen Thermofisher Scientific), CD4 PERCP-Cy5.5 (L200, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD8 BV510 (RPA-8, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), PD-1 BV711 (EH12.2H7, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD27 PE-Cy5 (1A4, Beckman Coulter), CD45RA BV570 (HI100, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA).
    CD19
    suggested: (GenWay Biotech Inc. Cat# GWB-A1A4EC, RRID:AB_10513741)
    SJ25-C1
    suggested: None
    CD8
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 344731, RRID:AB_2564623)
    PD-1 BV711
    suggested: None
    CD45RA
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 304131, RRID:AB_10897946)
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    SARS-CoV-2 antigens: For serology assays, SARS-CoV-2 original and beta variant spike proteins were expressed in Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293F suspension cells by transfecting the cells with the spike plasmid.
    HEK
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_6642)
    Pseudovirus neutralization assay: SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped lentiviruses were prepared by co-transfecting the HEK 293T cell line with either the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral variant spike (D614G), the Beta spike (L18F, D80A, D215G, K417N, E484K, N501Y, D614G, A701V, 242-244 del) or the Delta spike (T19R, R158G L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N, 156-157 del) plasmids in conjunction with a firefly luciferase encoding lentivirus backbone plasmid.
    HEK 293T
    suggested: None
    Jurkat-Lucia™ NFAT-CD16 cells (Invivogen) (2×105 cells/well) were added and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2.
    NFAT-CD16
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_A7ZT)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Mutations were confirmed visually with bam files using Geneious software (Biomatters Ltd, New Zealand).
    Geneious
    suggested: (Geneious, RRID:SCR_010519)
    Samples were acquired on a BD LSR-II flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo (v10, FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.