SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit higher levels of original antigenic sin antibodies compared with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.30.21264363: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    ELISA plates were washed 3 times with 1x PBS supplemented with 2% Tween (PBS-T) before the addition of goat anti-human IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody at a 1:5000 dilution (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA: cat. 109-036-098).
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    Serum antibody titers were obtained from a standard curve of either serially diluted monoclonal antibody (CR3022 for SARS-CoV-2 or CR9114 for influenza virus HA starting at 0.5μg/mL) or serially diluted pooled serum (for OC43 ELISAs).
    SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    293F cells were transfected with S1 or S2 encoding plasmids and proteins were purified from cell culture supernatant 6 days later with Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
    293F
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.