Germinal center responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in healthy and immunocompromised individuals

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.16.21263686: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Written informed consent for participation was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki and protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania.
    IRB: Written informed consent for participation was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki and protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    After resting overnight, CD40 blocking antibody was added to both duplicate wells for 15 minutes prior to stimulation.
    CD40
    suggested: None
    Plates were then washed again with PBS-T three times and 50 µl of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–labeled goat anti-human IgG (1:5000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) secondary antibodies was added.
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    Serum antibody concentrations were reported as arbitrary units relative to the CR3022 monoclonal antibody.
    CR3022
    suggested: None
    Also included in this mixture to neutralize any potential VSV-G carryover virus was 1E9F9, a mouse anti-VSV Indiana G, at a concentration of 600 ng/ml (Absolute Antibody).
    anti-VSV
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    SARS-CoV-2 RBD and FL proteins were produced in 293F cells and purified using nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) resin (Qiagen).
    293F
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)
    Pseudovirus neutralization assay: Production of VSV pseudotypes with SARS-CoV-2 S: 293T cells plated 24 hours previously at 5 × 106 cells per 10 cm dish were transfected using calcium phosphate with 35 µg of pCG1 SARS-CoV-2 S D614G delta18 or pCG1 SARS-CoV-2 S B.1.351 delta 18 expression plasmid encoding a codon optimized SARS-CoV2 S gene with an 18 residue truncation in the cytoplasmic tail (kindly provided by Stefan Pohlmann).
    293T
    suggested: None
    Vero E6 cells stably expressing TMPRSS2 were seeded in 100 µl at 2.5×104 cells/well in a 96 well collagen coated plate.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    The serum-virus mixture was then used to replace the media on VeroE6 TMPRSS2 cells.
    VeroE6 TMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Pseudovirus neutralization assay: Production of VSV pseudotypes with SARS-CoV-2 S: 293T cells plated 24 hours previously at 5 × 106 cells per 10 cm dish were transfected using calcium phosphate with 35 µg of pCG1 SARS-CoV-2 S D614G delta18 or pCG1 SARS-CoV-2 S B.1.351 delta 18 expression plasmid encoding a codon optimized SARS-CoV2 S gene with an 18 residue truncation in the cytoplasmic tail (kindly provided by Stefan Pohlmann).
    pCG1 SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    pCG1
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    . viSNE analysis: viSNE analysis was performed on Cytobank (https://cytobank.org).
    Cytobank
    suggested: (Cytobank, RRID:SCR_014043)
    AIM assay data were visualized using RStudio.
    RStudio
    suggested: (RStudio, RRID:SCR_000432)
    Statistical analysis: GraphPad Prism software version 9 was used for generating dot plots, bar plots and the correlation images presented in this work.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    These limitations emphasize the need for directly probing GC responses by adopting minimally invasive approaches, such as fine-needle-aspiration, that allow longitudinal sampling of the vaccine draining lymph nodes without requiring their surgical excision. Only two published studies ever described human GC responses to vaccination (against influenza or SARS-CoV-2) in humans by using the FNA technique (Turner et al., 2020, 2021). One study (Turner et al., 2021), reported S-specific GC B cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in lymph nodes, but did not investigate the generation of RBD-specific GC B cells or the connection between SARS-CoV-2-specific GC B cells and Tfh cells, nAbs, and SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells. Our study sought to address these open questions by performing an in-depth profiling of the GC responses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines directly in lymphoid tissue. We found that these vaccines prompted the formation of robust Full S and RBD-specific GC B cell as well as Tfh cell responses localized in draining axillary lymph nodes. Importantly, our study revealed that lymphoid tissue SARS-CoV-2-specific GC B cell populations were strongly associated with the ability to produce SARS-CoV-2 nAbs, as further supported by the evidence that immunosuppressed individuals, who cannot form GCs, present a deeply blunted nAb production (Results in KTX are discussed at length below). Although to a lower degree, we also found that bona fide Tfh cells in drain...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.