Neutralizing and protective human monoclonal antibodies recognizing the N-terminal domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.19.427324: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableProtection against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 in mice: Male and female heterozygous K18-hACE C57BL/6J mice were housed in groups of up to 5 mice per cage at 18 to 24°C ambient temperatures and 40 to 60% humidity.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The bound antibodies were detected using goat anti-human IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Southern Biotech, cat. 2040-05, lot B3919-XD29, 1:5,000 dilution) and a 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: (SouthernBiotech Cat# 2040-05, RRID:AB_2795644)
    The plates were incubated sequentially with 1 μg/mL of rCR3022 anti-S antibody or an murine anti-SARS-COV-2 mAb, SARS2-16 (hybridoma supernatant diluted 1:6,000 to a final concentration of ∼20 ng/mL) and then HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, A6029) in PBS supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) saponin (Sigma) and 0.1% BSA.
    anti-S
    suggested: None
    anti-SARS-COV-2
    suggested: None
    Recombinant human ACE2 with a C-terminal Flag tag peptide was added to wells at 2 μg/mL in a 5 μL per well volume (final 0.4 μg/mL concentration of human ACE2) without washing of antibody and then incubated for 40 min at ambient temperature.
    ACE2
    suggested: None
    Plates were washed and bound human ACE2 was detected using HRP-conjugated anti-Flag antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.
    anti-Flag
    suggested: None
    To verify escape from antibody selection, isolated viruses were assessed in a subsequent RTCA experiment in the presence of 10 μg/mL (COV2-2676) and 100 µg/mL (COV2-2489) of mAb as used for the escape virus selection.
    COV2-2676
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    A suspension of 18,000 Vero-E6 cells in 50 μL of cell culture medium was seeded in each well, and the plate was placed on the analyzer.
    Vero-E6
    suggested: None
    Triplicate wells containing virus only (maximal CPE in the absence of mAb) and wells containing only Vero cells in medium (no-CPE wells) were included as controls.
    Vero
    suggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)
    The mixture was added to pre-chilled Vero or Vero+ACE2+TMPRSS2 cells at an MOI of 0.005 and incubated at 4°C for 1 h.
    Vero+ACE2+TMPRSS2
    suggested: None
    A plasmid encoding cDNA for each spike protein mutant was transfected into HEK-293T cells and allowed to express for 22 h.
    HEK-293T
    suggested: None
    A suspension of 18,000 Vero E6 cells in 50 μL of cell culture medium was seeded per each well, and plates were placed on the analyzer.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Protection against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 in mice: Male and female heterozygous K18-hACE C57BL/6J mice were housed in groups of up to 5 mice per cage at 18 to 24°C ambient temperatures and 40 to 60% humidity.
    C57BL/6J
    suggested: None
    The samples were then analyzed by Eve Technologies Corporation (Calgary, AB, Canada).
    AB
    suggested: RRID:BDSC_203)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    EC50 values for binding were determined using Prism v.
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    Briefly, 50 μL of cell culture medium (DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS) was added to each well of a 96-well E-plate using a ViaFlo384 liquid handler (Integra Biosciences) to obtain background reading.
    Integra Biosciences
    suggested: None
    Image processing was performed using the cryoSPARC software package.
    cryoSPARC
    suggested: (cryoSPARC, RRID:SCR_016501)
    Cells were washed twice and fixed with 4% PFA prior to detection of fluorescence signal by flow cytometry (MacsQuant) and analysis using FlowJo software.
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    Specific primers and probe were used: Forward primer: ATGCTGCAATCGTGCTACAA; Reverse primer: GACTGCCGCCTCTGCTC; Probe: /56-FAM/TCAAGGAAC/ZEN/AACATTGCCAA/3IABkFQ/.
    GACTGCCGCCTCTGCTC
    suggested: None
    For analysis of mouse studies, the comparison of weight-change curves was performed using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test using Prism v.9.0 (GraphPad).
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.