Extremely potent human monoclonal antibodies from COVID-19 convalescent patients

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.07.328302: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: IRCCS - Lazzaro Spallanzani Rome (IT) and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena (IT) that provided samples from SARS-CoV-2 convalescent donors who gave their written consent.
    IRB: The study was approved by local ethics committees (Parere 18_2020 in Rome and Parere 17065 in Siena) and conducted according to good clinical practice in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki (European Council 2001, US Code of Federal Regulations, ICH 1997).
    RandomizationThis study was unblinded and not randomized.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Blood samples were screened for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and for antibodies against HIV, HBV and HCV.
    antibodies against HIV
    suggested: None
    HCV
    suggested: None
    ELISA assay with S1 and S2 subunits of SARS-CoV-2 S-protein: The presence of S1- and S2-binding antibodies in culture supernatants of monoclonal S-protein-specific memory B cells was assessed by means of an ELISA assay implemented with the use of a commercial kit (ELISA Starter Accessory Kit, Catalogue No. E101; Bethyl Laboratories).
    S2-binding
    suggested: None
    After an incubation of 1 h at 37°C, plates were washed and incubated with 25 μl/well secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-human IgG-Fc Fragment polyclonal antibody, diluted 1:10,000 in blocking buffer, Catalogue No. A80-104P; (Bethyl Laboratories) for 1 h at 37°C.
    anti-human IgG-Fc
    suggested: (Bethyl Cat# A80-104P, RRID:AB_67064)
    25 μL/well of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) and IgA (Jackson Immuno Research) were used as secondary antibodies.
    alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG
    suggested: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 109-055-190, RRID:AB_2888997)
    PNPP (p-nitrophenyl phosphate) (Thermo Fisher) was used as soluble substrate to detect SARS-CoV-2 S-protein specific monoclonal antibodies and the final reaction was measured by using the Varioskan Lux Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a wavelength of 405 nm.
    ( p-nitrophenyl phosphate )
    suggested: None
    p-nitrophenyl phosphate
    suggested: None
    Affinity evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies: Anti-Human IgG Polyclonal Antibody (Southern Biotech 2040-01) was immobilized via amine group on two flow cells of a CM5 sensor chip.
    SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies: Anti-Human IgG Polyclonal Antibody
    suggested: None
    Following the capture of each mAb by the immobilized anti-human IgG antibody, different concentrations of SPIKE protein (20 μg/ml, 10 μg/ml, 5 μg/ml, 2.5 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml in HBS-EP+) were injected over both the blank flow cell and the flow cell containing the captured mAb for 180 sec at a flow rate of 80 μl/min.
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    For titration and neutralization tests of SARS-CoV-2, Vero E6 were seeded in 96-well plates (Sarstedt) at a density of 1,5×104 cells/well the day before the assay.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The protein was purified from filtered cell supernatants using NiNTA resin (GE Healtcare #11-0004-58)
    GE Healtcare
    suggested: None
    Results were analyzed by FlowJo (version 10)
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.