Genome-Scale Identification of SARS-CoV-2 and Pan-coronavirus Host Factor Networks

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.07.326462: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableCell culture: Lenti-X 293T™ cells (H. sapiens; sex: female) obtained from Takara (cat. #632180) and Huh-7.5 cells (H. sapiens; sex: male) (Blight et al., 2002) were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Fisher Scientific, cat. #11995065) supplemented with 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (NEAA, Fisher Scientific, cat. #11140076) and 10% hyclone fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone Laboratories, Lot. #AUJ35777)
    Cell Line AuthenticationContamination: Both cell lines have tested negative for contamination with mycoplasma.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    To stain for SARS-CoV-2, a rabbit polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody (GeneTex: catalog no. GTX135357) was added to the cells at a 1:1,000 dilution in blocking solution and incubated at 4 °C overnight.
    anti-SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    To detect infected cells for HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-NL63, a mouse monoclonal anti-dsRNA antibody (Scicons: catalog no. 10010500) was used under similar conditions.
    anti-dsRNA
    suggested: (Millipore Cat# MABE1134, RRID:AB_2819101)
    Goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488 (Life Technologies: catalog no. A-11012) and goat anti-mouse AlexaFluor 488 (Life Technologies: catalog no. A-11001) were used as a secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:2,000.
    anti-rabbit
    suggested: None
    anti-mouse
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Production and titration of coronavirus stocks: SARS-CoV-2 (strain: USA-WA1/2020) and HCoV-NL63 were obtained from BEI Resources (NR-52281 and NR-470).
    HCoV-NL63
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_RW88)
    All viruses were amplified at 33 °C in Huh-7.5 cells to generate a P1 stock.
    Huh-7.5
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_7927)
    Huh-7.5-Cas9 cells transduced with the Brunello sgRNA library were seeded in p150 plates at 4.5 × 106 cells/plate with two plates per replicate (e.g., 9 × 106 cells) and three replicates for each condition (mock, HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43).
    Huh-7.5-Cas9
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (ThermoFisher Scientific: catalog no. 62249) at a 1:1,000 dilution.
    ThermoFisher Scientific
    suggested: None
    Briefly, enriched pathways were identified from the NIH NCATS BioPlanet database (Huang et al., 2019), which aggregates currates pathways from multiple sources, using competitive gene set testing of z scores in pre-ranked mode (Wu and Smyth, 2012).
    NCATS BioPlanet
    suggested: None
    For construction of the network in Figure 3, significant CRISPR hits from any virus were searched using the STRING database (string-db.org) (Szklarczyk et al., 2019) using default parameters and imported into Cytoscape (Shannon et al., 2003)
    STRING
    suggested: (STRING, RRID:SCR_005223)
    Cytoscape
    suggested: (Cytoscape, RRID:SCR_003032)
    Overlapping hits per virus were calculated and subsequently depicted as pie charts per node in Adobe Illustrator.
    Adobe Illustrator
    suggested: (Adobe Illustrator, RRID:SCR_010279)
    Analysis of scRNAseq data: For scRNAseq analysis, Seurat objects were downloaded from FigShare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12436517) (Chua et al., 2020).
    FigShare
    suggested: (FigShare, RRID:SCR_004328)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    The results of this study should be interpreted within the context of its limitations. If a gene did not score in our screens, it does not rule out that gene being an important SARS-CoV-2 factor for a number of reasons. First, pooled CRISPR screens may not identify functionally redundant or buffering genes (Ewen-Campen et al., 2017). Second, Huh-7.5 cells were chosen based on their infectivity by multiple coronaviruses; however, it should be understood that they are not airway cells. Nevertheless, a recent study demonstrated that hits in Huh-7 cells translate to human cells of lung origin (Baggen et al., 2020). Furthermore, as shown in Figure S6, the vast majority of genes identified here are expressed in human cells and tissues known to be infected by SARS-CoV-2. Lastly, our current experimental system is limited to assessing survival and can not interrogate host factors that act in late stages of the viral life cycle, nor can it identify genes that play important roles in immune modulation and pathogenesis. It is essential to understand the underlying biology of a disease in order to develop new strategies for treatment and prevention. For infectious diseases, this entails studying the biology of the pathogen and the host. We identified complex, interconnected networks of coronavirus host factors and pathways that are essential for virus infection, nominating hundreds of new host proteins that represent liabilities for SARS-CoV-2 and potential opportunities for therapeutic ...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.