Treatments, resource utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments across pandemic waves: an observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN)
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Background
Treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) evolved between pandemic waves. Our objective was to compare treatments, acute care utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) across pandemic waves.
Methods
This observational study enrolled consecutive eligible COVID-19 patients presenting to 46 EDs participating in the Canadian COVID-19 ED Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) between March 1 and December 31, 2020. We collected data by retrospective chart review. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included treatments, hospital and ICU admissions, ED revisits and readmissions. Logistic regression modeling assessed the impact of pandemic wave on outcomes.
Results
We enrolled 9,967 patients in 8 provinces, 3,336 from the first and 6,631 from the second wave. Patients in the second wave were younger, fewer met criteria for severe COVID-19, and more were discharged from the ED. Adjusted for patient characteristics and disease severity, steroid use increased (odds ratio [OR] 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2–8.9), and invasive mechanical ventilation decreased (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4–0.7) in the second wave compared to the first. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics and disease severity, the odds of hospitalization (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6–0.8) and critical care admission (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6–0.9) decreased, while mortality remained unchanged (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–1.1).
Interpretation
In patients presenting to cute care facilities, we observed rapid uptake of evidence-based therapies and less use of experimental therapies in the second wave. We observed increased rates of ED discharges and lower hospital and critical care resource use over time. Substantial reductions in mechanical ventilation were not associated with increasing mortality. Advances in treatment strategies created health system efficiencies without compromising patient outcomes.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04702945.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.30.21261288: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: Design and Setting: This pan-Canadian observational study enrolled consecutive eligible COVID-19 patients who presented to the EDs of 46 participating acute care hospitals between March 1 and December 31, 2020.(17) The research ethics boards of participating institutions reviewed and approved the study protocol with a waiver of informed consent for patient enrollment. Sex as a biological variable We conducted subgroup analyses on patients with severe COVID, pregnant patients, those reporting unstable housing, and those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences R… SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.30.21261288: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: Design and Setting: This pan-Canadian observational study enrolled consecutive eligible COVID-19 patients who presented to the EDs of 46 participating acute care hospitals between March 1 and December 31, 2020.(17) The research ethics boards of participating institutions reviewed and approved the study protocol with a waiver of informed consent for patient enrollment. Sex as a biological variable We conducted subgroup analyses on patients with severe COVID, pregnant patients, those reporting unstable housing, and those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources We conducted all analyses using Stata (Version 16.1, StataCorp, College Station, Texas). StataCorpsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:
Identifier Status Title NCT04702945 Recruiting Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Registry Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-