Efficacy and safety of intravenous sufentanil administration in low-severity acute trauma as a competence of paramedics: a follow-up observational study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and importance

In the Czech Republic, paramedics are required to consult a physician before administering intravenous opioids, which may delay effective prehospital pain management. As paramedic competencies expand in Europe, it is important to evaluate the safety and efficacy of independent opioid administration in prehospital emergency care settings.

Objectives

To assess the safety and effectiveness of intravenous sufentanil administered independently by trained paramedics compared to administration following remote physician consultation in adult trauma patients.

Design

Prospective, single-center, observational cohort study.

Settings and participants

Conducted at the Emergency Medical Services of the Karlovy Vary Region between January 1 and December 31, 2024. The study included 462 adult trauma patients who were hemodynamically stable and conscious. Patients were divided into two groups: the Consultation group (physician consultation required) and the Competency group (paramedics administering independently).

Intervention or exposure

Intravenous administration of sufentanil, with or without physician phone consultation.

Outcome measures and analysis

Primary outcomes included reduction in pain (measured using the Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) and incidence of adverse events (e.g., respiratory depression, oxygen desaturation, hypotension, and antiemetic use). Statistical significance was set at p  < 0.05.

Main results

Both groups achieved similar pain reduction. The Competency group received a higher mean dose of sufentanil (9.7 ± 3.0 µg vs. 8.9 ± 2.8 µg; p  = 0.006) and more frequently used non-opioid adjuvant analgesics (54% vs. 41%). Documentation of pain scores was significantly better in the Competency group (87% vs. 43%; p  < 0.01). Adverse events were rare, non-serious, and comparable between groups. Antiemetics were more frequently administered in the Competency group (11% vs. 6%; p  = 0.037). A minor, clinically insignificant reduction in diastolic blood pressure was observed in the Competency group.

Conclusion

Intravenous sufentanil administered independently by trained paramedics in adult patients with lower severity trauma demonstrated safety and effectiveness comparable to administration following remote physician consultation, along with improved documentation and increased use of multimodal analgesia. Although this was a monocentric study, these observations may contribute to ongoing discussions about expanding paramedic competencies in opioid analgesia within the Czech prehospital emergency system.

Article activity feed