Prevalence of anti–platelet factor 4/polyanionic antibodies after COVID‐19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 and CoronaVac in Thais

  1. Phichchapha Noikongdee
  2. Pornnapa Police
  3. Tichayapa Phojanasenee
  4. Pichika Chantrathammachart
  5. Pimjai Niparuck
  6. Teeraya Puavilai
  7. Angsana Phuphuakrat
  8. Pantep Angchaisuksiri
  9. Kochawan Boonyawat

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1002/rth2.12600
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.15.21260622: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: All participants gave written informed consent.
    IRB: The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Anti-PF4/polyanionic antibodies were screened by IgG-specific ELISA (Hyphen Biomed Zymutest HIA IgG, Quadratech Diagnostics, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
    Anti-PF4/polyanionic
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All statical analyses were performed on GraphPad Prism 9.1.1 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and Stata statistical software version 15.1 (StataCorp, TX, 2018).
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Stata statistical
    suggested: None
    StataCorp
    suggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2021.07.15.21260622v1 on medRxiv