Nucleotide analogues as inhibitors of SARS‐CoV Polymerase
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
SARS‐CoV‐2, a member of the coronavirus family, has caused a global public health emergency. Based on our analysis of hepatitis C virus and coronavirus replication, and the molecular structures and activities of viral inhibitors, we previously reasoned that the FDA‐approved hepatitis C drug EPCLUSA (Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir) should inhibit coronaviruses, including SARS‐CoV‐2. Here, using model polymerase extension experiments, we demonstrate that the active triphosphate form of Sofosbuvir is incorporated by low‐fidelity polymerases and SARS‐CoV RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and blocks further incorporation by these polymerases; the active triphosphate form of Sofosbuvir is not incorporated by a host‐like high‐fidelity DNA polymerase. Using the same molecular insight, we selected 3’‐fluoro‐3’‐deoxythymidine triphosphate and 3’‐azido‐3’‐deoxythymidine triphosphate, which are the active forms of two other anti‐viral agents, Alovudine and AZT (an FDA‐approved HIV/AIDS drug) for evaluation as inhibitors of SARS‐CoV RdRp. We demonstrate the ability of two of these HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors to be incorporated by SARS‐CoV RdRp where they also terminate further polymerase extension. Given the 98% amino acid similarity of the SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2 RdRps, we expect these nucleotide analogues would also inhibit the SARS‐CoV‐2 polymerase. These results offer guidance to further modify these nucleotide analogues to generate more potent broad‐spectrum anti‐coronavirus agents.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.03.18.997585: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.03.18.997585: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
-