Reduced pediatric urgent asthma utilization and exacerbations during the COVID‐19 pandemic

  1. Jillian H. Hurst
  2. Congwen Zhao
  3. Nicholas S. Fitzpatrick
  4. Benjamin A. Goldstein
  5. Jason E. Lang

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic has had a profound impact on healthcare access and utilization, which could have important implications for children with chronic diseases, including asthma. We sought to evaluate changes in healthcare utilization and outcomes in children with asthma during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We used electronic health records data to evaluate healthcare use and asthma outcomes in 3959 children and adolescents, 5–17 years of age, with a prior diagnosis of asthma who had a history of well‐child visits and encounters within the healthcare system. We assessed all‐cause healthcare encounters and asthma exacerbations in the 12‐months preceding the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic (March 1, 2019–February 29, 2020) and the first 12 months of the pandemic (March 1, 2020–February 28, 2021). All‐cause healthcare encounters decreased significantly during the pandemic compared to the preceding year, including well‐child visits (48.1% during the pandemic vs. 66.6% in the prior year; p  < .01), emergency department visits (9.7% vs. 21.0%; p  < .01), and inpatient admissions (1.6% vs. 2.5%; p  < .01), though there was over a 100‐fold increase in telehealth encounters. Asthma exacerbations that required treatment with systemic steroids also decreased (127 vs. 504 exacerbations; p  < .01). Race/ethnicity was not associated with changes in healthcare utilization or asthma outcomes. The COVID‐19 pandemic corresponded to dramatic shifts in healthcare utilization, including increased telehealth use and improved outcomes among children with asthma. Social distancing measures may have also reduced asthma trigger exposure.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1002/ppul.25578
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.28.21256263: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: System (DUHS) Institutional Review Board (Pro00091342).
    Consent: The requirement for informed consent was waived under 45 CFR 46.116.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2021.04.28.21256263 on medRxiv