Assessment of a Program for SARS-CoV-2 Screening and Environmental Monitoring in an Urban Public School District
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255036: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Saliva SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing for asymptomatic case detection: Electronic registration and consent for saliva testing was performed with the Nebraska University Laboratory Information Reporting Tool ( Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Pilot program setting: The Omaha Public School district is comprised of 82 primary and secondary schools, roughly 20 programs, and more than 53,000 students and 9,200 school-based staff. Pilotsuggested: (Pipeline Pilot, RRID:SCR_014917)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255036: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Saliva SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing for asymptomatic case detection: Electronic registration and consent for saliva testing was performed with the Nebraska University Laboratory Information Reporting Tool ( Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Pilot program setting: The Omaha Public School district is comprised of 82 primary and secondary schools, roughly 20 programs, and more than 53,000 students and 9,200 school-based staff. Pilotsuggested: (Pipeline Pilot, RRID:SCR_014917)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
