Assessment of a COVID-19 Control Plan on an Urban University Campus During a Second Wave of the Pandemic

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.23.21252319: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: Ethics The plan for this analysis was reviewed by the Boston University CRC Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was classified as non-human subjects research.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    This blended modality allowed classes to accommodate on-line only students using Zoom software and in-person students simultaneously.
    Zoom
    suggested: (ZOOM, RRID:SCR_002175)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    There were several limitations to the latter study including the selection criteria for inclusion of universities that resulted in only one Boston-area institution of higher education in the analysis and assuming that transmission in the community arose from the university campus rather than the converse, which did not account for evidence from the BU contact tracing efforts, as described above, that suggested 55.7% of the transmission was exogenous (i.e. arising in the community). BU’s success is consistent with current understanding of best practices for COVID-19 control. In fact, these strategies of aggressive testing, contact tracing, and quarantine and isolation have been successfully implemented in many countries, including Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan.21–23 However, unlike these countries, the BU setting did not allow the restriction of travel between the campus and nearby community, making this a strong demonstration of the utility of these approaches even despite substantial importation of cases from the surrounding community. This can potentially serve as a model for other institutions nested within a broader community. The semester was not without challenges. There were times when the contact tracing team was unable to identify contacts due to some students’ reluctance to divulge information regarding where they had been or who they had been with. In these cases, coordination between the dean of students and the contact tracing team was critical in identifyin...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.