Genotype and methylation interact to reconfigure transcriptional regulation in colorectal cancer

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Transcriptional regulation is shaped by both genomic variants and the environment. Yet, how the regulatory effects of genomic variants are reconfigured by dynamic epigenomic changes during tumorigenesis remains incompletely understood.

Methods

We investigated methylation context-dependent links between genotype and gene expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) using paired tumor and normal-adjacent tissue (NAT) from 80 patients, thereby controlling for germline genomic background. By integrating promoter-targeted bisulfite sequencing with RNA-seq, we systematically compared expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs). To capture regulatory complexity beyond simple mediation, we implemented a memo-eQTL framework that explicitly models genotype × DNA methylation (G×M) interactions.

Results

We observed extensive tissue specificity in both eQTL and mQTL landscapes; tumor-specific eGenes were significantly enriched for hallmark oncogenic pathways, including WNT and MAPK signaling. Standard mediation models explained only a minority of genotype–expression relationships, whereas our explicit interaction framework revealed widespread reconfiguration of methylation-dependent genetic effects in tumors. Memo-eQTL mapping (FDR < 0.05) identified 18 NAT and 73 tumor eGenes with significant G×M interactions, and results were consistent at a more permissive threshold (FDR < 0.2). We further developed a patient-level memo-eQTL score and found that interaction-based regulatory disruption in NAT, but not in tumor, significantly correlated with clinical stage ( P = 0.035).

Conclusions

Genetic regulation in cancer is reorganized through context-dependent G×M interactions. Importantly, G×M signatures in NAT are specifically linked to disease progression, offering new insights into field cancerization and the clinical consequences of regulatory reprogramming in CRC.

Article activity feed