Hemodynamic phenotypes linked to high-altitude subclinical organ damage

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic exposure to high-altitude hypoxia imposes sustained cardiovascular stress, yet hemodynamic adaptation among healthy high-altitude dwellers is heterogeneous and remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to identify distinct hemodynamic phenotypes in a healthy high-altitude population using unsupervised machine learning and to evaluate their association with multi-system subclinical target organ damage.

Methods

This cross-sectional study enrolled 694 healthy adults permanently residing at ≥3300 m on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Unsupervised K-means clustering was performed on nine hemodynamic variables, including peripheral and central blood pressures, augmentation index (AIx), pulse pressure amplification ratio (pPP/cPP), and systolic pressure amplification (pSBP-cSBP). Differences across phenotypes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were assessed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests.

Results

Three distinct hemodynamic phenotypes were successfully identified. The C2 (Balanced Adaptation) phenotype (n = 245) demonstrated the most favorable hemodynamic profile, characterized by the lowest blood pressure and augmentation index (AIx) values, along with the highest peripheral-to-central pulse pressure ratio (pPP/cPP). The C1 (Vascular Stress) phenotype (n = 267) presented with normal peripheral systolic blood pressure (125.9 ± 11.3 mmHg) but exhibited markedly elevated wave reflection indices, including the highest heart rate-adjusted augmentation index (AIx@HR75: 31.9 ± 9.7%) and the lowest pPP/cPP ratio (1.29 ± 0.08). The C3 (High-Load Decompensation) phenotype (n = 182) displayed significantly elevated blood pressures and the greatest overall hemodynamic load. Regarding target organ damage, a clear gradient was observed across the three phenotypes. The C3 phenotype showed the highest carotid intima-media thickness (IMT: 1.162 ± 0.23 mm) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI: 69.18 ± 40.73 g/m²). Conversely, the C2 phenotype exhibited the highest estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: 97.38 ± 16.38 mL/min/1.73m²) and the lowest IMT (0.994 ± 0.26 mm). The C1 phenotype consistently displayed intermediate values for all organ damage indicators. After Bonferroni correction, all pairwise comparisons for LVMI and pulse wave velocity (PWV) reached statistical significance (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Healthy high-altitude individuals manifest three distinct hemodynamic phenotypes arrayed along a cardiovascular risk continuum. The novel Vascular Stress (C1) phenotype represents a “masked” high-risk state characterized by normal peripheral blood pressure but elevated arterial stiffness and wave reflection, challenging sole reliance on brachial pressure for risk assessment. This phenotype-based stratification provides a framework for precision prevention and early intervention in high-altitude populations.

Article activity feed