Representation Methods of Transcriptomics with Applications in Neuroimmune Biology

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Interpretable representations of gene expression are used to define cellular identities and the molecular programs active within cells, two related, but distinct phenomena. In the case of microglia, a cell type with high transcriptomic, functional, and morphological heterogeneity, the predominant representation of transcriptomic data presumes the adoption of distinct molecular identities, despite a lack of easily separable transcriptional states. Here, we explore alternative transcriptomic representations by comparing two single-cell analysis methods: differential expression analysis for identities and co-expression network analysis for molecular programs. For microglia, co-expression network analysis identifies highly significant functional ontologies not resolved by differential expression analysis. The identified co-expression modules are preserved across transcriptomic datasets and suggest reducible functional programs that activate and modulate depending on context. We conclude that co-expression analysis constitutes a best practice for single cell analysis of an individual cell type and describing microglia function as concurrent molecular programs offers a more parsimonious model of microglia function.

Article activity feed